As I mentioned yesterday, I read a new book called The Shack during our vacation this past weekend. My friend Jason (who doesn't have a blog but should) gave it to me to read so we could discuss it. The book is quickly becoming very popular - especially among people who have experienced some kind of tragedy in their life.
The Shack is a novel about a man whose daughter is killed in a heinous way. During the grieving process, the man receives a letter telling him to meet "Papa" at the shack where the only evidence of his daughter's brutal murder is found. He shows up to meet God (a large black woman named Papa), Jesus (who is described like a middle-eastern lumberjack and gets to keep His name), and the Holy Spirit (personified as a beautiful Asian woman named Saraya). That will make (and probably should make) you pretty nervous at the outset, though the personifications serve a purpose in the story, and don't come across as blasphemously as they may seem.
The book is a fiction book, though it is very clear throughout that the author intended to use it to teach Truth about God, the problem of evil, and heaven. Unfortunately, because the book is a novel, the author doesn't make it clear exactly which pieces of the story are artistic license, which are biblically founded Truths about God, and which are speculation on the author's part. That in and of itself makes this a very difficult book to recommend to anyone - especially those seeking comfort in the character of God.
The book goes from modalism (an ancient heresy that pictures God showing up in 3 different "modes" or "forms") to decent Trinitarian theology in a page and a half, which was extremely confusing as a reader. It also presented a view of a God who limits Himself with regard to the way He relates to the world to the point that He is presented as not having a plan that includes the existence of evil at all.
The Shack also presented the idea of judgment as something that is not carried out by God, but by Wisdom (a character presented as separate from God). In fact, when the main character returns to God having been judged, God is excited that Wisdom "got through" to the main character. This portrayal of God as "good cop" and Wisdom as "bad cop" may have been the most troubling portion of the book to me.
The picture of heaven is a mix between biblical heaven, Buddhism, and New Age Mysticism. The author describes characters in heaven as having auras that translate colors between each other based on the intimacy of their relationship. Sound weird? I thought so too.
There are some good moments in the book. The gospel is absolutely clear in one section (though muddied up later), and a section in which the author demonstrates the need for humanity to draw near to God while dealing with the problem of evil. There's a very compelling and helpful illustration using poison ivy in a garden, which is only poisonous when the character is separate from God.
I can certainly see how The Shack would be comforting to a person dealing with the loss of a loved one, or significant pain in their life. However, in my opinion it contains an extremely dangerous mixture of Truth and fiction in such a way that the two aren't distinguished. The reader with little Biblical literacy will find much in the story that they recognize from the Bible. What they may not recognize are the things that are artistic license, speculation, and even some outright heresy.
If you choose to read The Shack, please be extremely careful. To steal and tweak one of the author's own illustrations, there are some gorgeous flowers in the book... but there's also some poison ivy. Make sure you know which is which.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
sounds interesting...i will have to check it out and add it too my reading list!
so i read this book about a month ago and absolutely fell in love with it!
but im curious to know... where have you found heresy in this book?
it seems to me that we get so caught up in religion these days that we forget that the only thing that matters is god.
our interpretation is not important. god is. jesus is. love is.
so im just curious... what do you see in this book that gos out-right against the bible? it seems to me some of this is interpretation only a matter of opinion...
and jesus always especially fond of metaphors wasnt he? =>
Hey carson,
Agree that "the only thing that matters is God," but we have to make sure that the "god" it's all about is the "God" who has revealed Himself in the Bible.
God does not separate Himself from judgment in the way that Papa separates herself from judgment in The Shack (Sophia judges Mack, not God). I've already pointed out the tendency toward modalism.
One of the other troubling lines in the book that teeters on the border of universalism is a line where we're told Jesus has no interest in making people into Christians. I think Peter and Paul would have been awfully surprised at that declaration. "Christians" don't have to look like some of the Christians today, but make no mistake - Jesus is certainly interested in making people into Christ-followers.
I agree with you in that I saw lots of helpful things in this book. But there are certainly some major, major ditches you want to avoid.
Thanks for reading...
Chris,
I loved talking with you and then reading your comments. I think we agree and thank you for helping me with some of my questions. I absolutely agree with your last sentence. The book does indeed have some gorgeous flowers but also some poison ivy and WE NEED to KNOW the difference.
Thanks,
Saundra
Thank you Chris!! The only authority on God is the bible. Many Blessings.
thanks for pointing me here. i'm nearing the end of the book right now and just wondered what you thought.
i was blown away by the garden chapter - where he talked about how our definitions of evil are subjective. i found it very profound.
i too was troubled by sophia/wisdom. in proverbs, i think, it talks about wisdom as if it is a person. i believe wisdom is personified a bit in other parts of scripture as well. (please correct me if i'm wrong.) but i had it explained to me to be referring to jesus more than anything else. the author of The Shack makes a small mention that Sophia is somehow a part of Sarayu, the Holy Spirit personified. so I was confused by that.
Also confusing was the description of heaven, especially the pearly gates explanation. I've never considered the biblical description as anything but literal before. any ideas here?
thanks again. as always.
Post a Comment